🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.