🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an celebration that began as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a commercial tone, expanding to include events where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to address predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The surge has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in the second month, but also in October in the Britain, Germany, Éire and the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since that time, placing less emphasis on the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the way the celebration is celebrated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it progresses is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a elected representative feels empowered to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the EU as a complete entity.

In the US, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the nation. A drive to remove the history of people of color and experience from the historical documents is under way. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the month illustrates how minimally it can be effective if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the conditions of the current era. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is required. A university professor, a educator at an educational institution, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden actions for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just do away with things like Black History Month completely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an era that has not worked.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an framework that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed across all seasons (as various establishments are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not shy away from governmental matters, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has simple recognition of the past when it fails to address the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Institutions who celebrate it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to subtle slights, but challenged by the risks that face all if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and reactive. Maybe an complete renaming is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.